In my estimation, a two-stage trigger in any rifle offers the most secure, precise, and safest function. Two-stage triggers appeared in U.S.-issue service rifles, such as the 1903, M1, M14. But for the AR-15/M16, it took the civilian-side aftermarket to create the two-stage trigger. The main reason other military-use rifles carried two-stage triggers is, primarily, because they are safer. There are other attributes to discuss, but safety is the main point in favor of a two-stage.
There are a good many two-stage triggers available now for the AR-style rifle platform. Development of available adaptations has been ongoing after introduction of the original and patented design by Charlie Milazzo. Most are knock-offs of his MKII; some are as good, some may be better, but the majority, in my opinion, are also-rans. A lot of fine work goes into producing a truly good trigger.
I’m often in the company of a gamut of AR-15 users, and the leading initial reactions from someone who first fires one of my competition guns results from the trigger function. “Whoa, how do you have so much creep in the trigger?” Fair question, because that’s what a two-stage trigger feels like. But from a functional standpoint, it’s not creep.
The two-stage trigger design features a tensioned first-stage movement or “take-up” prior to engaging the sear lever. The take-up of the first stage begins to minimize the amount of sear engagement, until it “bumps” into the second stage. This bump stops rearward trigger motion, indicating that the sears are then at minimum engagement. Depending on how the trigger has been adjusted, it may take only a few more ounces of rearward trigger pressure to cleanly overcome the second-stage weight and fire the shot. Because the sears are not minimized until the first stage is taken up makes a two-stage a safer trigger. Two-stage trigger sears have a large amount of sear overlapping until the first stage has been completely activated, that is, pulled through.
First stage added to the second stage is the total pull weight. So, it’s possible to take a majority of this total weight out of the pull in an effectively unnoticeable manner. A two-stage trigger is a better platform for breaking an accurate shot because it is easier for the shooter to feel the remaining additional weight (the second stage) as opposed to overcoming the total pull weight for a single-stage trigger. On my competition rifles, which have the very best two-stage triggers installed (and a whole lot of tuning time expended), I set the second stage to a relatively light weight.
Again, the safety point: If we have a second-stage break weight of 1 pound, after overcoming, say, 3 pounds of first-stage takeup, that is a far safer trigger than the 1-pound break weight single-stage necessary to duplicate the effective break weight of the “4-pound” two-stage. Follow?
Unlike a single-stage (which simply releases after so much pressure is applied, with no prior movement), the shooter can put his finger on the two-stage trigger face, prepare for his shot, and then reconsider it. Back it out, and start it over. With a single stage, when the finger goes on the trigger, the next thing that happens is the shot, or the finger comes away from the trigger face entirely to stop the process. There’s much more “connection” controlling a two-stage let-off.
Better is better. The question is always how good do you want? The “drop-in” and non-adjustable two-stage triggers out there are better than almost all stock triggers, immeasurably better, in my estimation. That said, tuning two-stage triggers requires a little creativity, but the better two-stage (and single-stage) “match” triggers have provisions for second-stage engagement adjustment. First-stage takeup weight can be adjusted with altering or replacing trigger return springs.
What’s less than ideal about two-stage triggers? Foremost is cost. But that’s something each shooter can decide to absorb, or not.
Second, I’m not convinced they are all reliable. I’ve not had one of mine malfunction, but I have had them change and require tune-up. The only trigger malfunctions I’ve encountered have been in tricked-up single-stage units. Keep a two-stage model well lubricated and clean, and it will deliver consistent let-off results, in my experience.
Another factor to note is that the distance to reset is greater with every two-stage I’ve encountered. By that I mean, how far the trigger must move forward after firing to reset the hammer for the next shot. If someone is trying to shoot rapid-fire as quickly as possible, a two-stage will slow things down. That was one of the first things I noticed when I first fired an AR-15 two-stage trigger. Compared to my previous competition NRA Service Rifle, the M1A, it felt like an eternity before I could get settled in for my next shot. The trigger in the M1A can be tuned so there is only a miniscule lessening of pressure on the trigger face necessary to reset, so it’s possible to shooter faster when the conditions and course warrant it.
Still, after you get accustomed to one in your AR-style rifle, a two-stage is the only way to go, in my opinion. A two-stage not only allows for more precision in firing, but it’s safer to use.
Do you own any two-stage triggers? What do you like, or not like, about them? Tell us in the comments below: