You are not logged in. Log In |  Register
  Previous Topic    Next Topic  
advanced

Posted:  11/6/2009 10:45 AM #20003
CTD Blogger


Joined: 7/14/2009
Posts: 830
Last Post: 11/20/2009
Subject: State gun storage law is argued before Massachusetts SJC
Boston, MA (Boston Globe) The Middlesex district attorney’s office argued before the state Supreme Judicial Court yesterday that a law that requires guns to be stored in locked containers or outfitted with trigger locks is valid.

But the attorney for a Billerica man charged with keeping a gun in an unlocked carrying case said the law is negated by a recent decision of the US Supreme Court.

While the Supreme Court struck down a tough handgun ban last year in the District of Columbia, the court “went out of its way to make clear that the right to bear arms, like all rights, is not unlimited,’’ said Assistant District Attorney Loretta M. Lillios. “It can be curtailed by regulatory measures.

The SJC is being asked to rule in a case in which Richard Runyan of Billerica was charged in April 2008 with improper gun storage.

A Lowell District Court judge threw out the charge, citing the June 2008 Supreme Court ruling in a case called District of Columbia v. Heller. Prosecutors appealed.

Attorney Brenden J. McMahon, representing Runyan, said the Supreme Court ruling held not only that the district’s “wholesale ban on guns is unconstitutional and violates the Second Amendment,’’ but that provisions requiring trigger locks were invalid.

Click here to read the entire article.

Jump to:
 
  Previous Topic    Next Topic  

CheaperThanDirtForums