You are not logged in. Log In |  Register New Search
  Previous Topic    Next Topic  

Posted:  1/22/2013 9:47 AM #36141
CTD Blogger

Joined: 7/14/2009
Posts: 10828
Last Post: 8/20/2014
Subject: Will the U.S. Follow Germany's Example?
From Gun Owners of America: Something very instructive just happened in Germany. Germany just implemented "a vast registry that details every legal gun owner in the country, along with information about all of their firearms." They did this, based on records that, in some cases, "were kept on index cards across what used to be 551 separate local registries."   Thus, with everyone's name already on an index card (read:  4473 forms) in what was effectively a "universal background check," it was a small step to a national gun registry. 
Not surprisingly, "gun rights groups" in Germany raised no real opposition.  "We are used to it," said one.
Now, in the words of The Washington Post:
nbsp;    If they are preparing a raid on a house, they can scout the address in the database to be better prepared for what weapons might lie within.  Before  the database, they could only guess at overall numbers, and finding the weapons registered to a certain address had been laborious.
Do we need any better indication of why "universal background checks" are the most insidious aspect of Barack Obama’s gun control? 
We know that gun confiscation is the ultimate endgame for many of the gun grabbers on the Left.  Consider just a few, recent well-known cases:
* "Confiscation could be an option," declared New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in a radio interview (December 27, 2012).
* "We cannot have big guns out here," said Iowa Rep. Dan Muhlbauer. "Even if you have them, I think we need to start taking them." (Interview with the Iowa Daily Times Herald, December 19, 2012.)
* "No one is allowed to be armed. We're going to take all the guns," said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of the New Orleans police, right before several law-enforcement agencies began confiscating the firearms of lawful gun owners in the wake of Hurricane Katrina (2005).
The task of confiscating guns is much easier when the government has a registration list.  And that is the number one reason gun owners should oppose background checks, because they give federal bureaucrats the framework for a national registration system.
If Obama gets his way, we will be much further down road to giving the Andrew Cuomos of the world the registration lists they need. 
Some liberal gun-grabbers are trying to paint it as "non-controversial."  But this hideous provision requiring every American to get the permission of the government before exercising their Second Amendment rights must be stopped.   
ACTIONClick here to contact your Senators and Representative.  Insist that they oppose the national background check, which would set the framework for a national gun registry and confiscation.

Posted:  1/22/2013 6:27 PM #36152

Joined: 5/2/2012
Posts: 2063
Last Post: 9/30/2014
As I have already posted on this forum, the way to the heart of any Democratic Party legislation is to "follow the power." Find the clause that transfers power from the individual, a state, or whatever, to the federal government, and that's what it's really about. Everything else in the bill is smokescreen and window dressing, to be sacrificed if necessary, in some grand compromise, to get what they really want.
The expected gun control legislation will be festooned with a myriad of demands - ban assault weapons and hi-capacity magazines, one gun a month, ban this or that kind of ammo, ban ammo sales over the Internet, etc. ad nauseum, but the core demand - universal background checks - an effort to close gun shows and eliminate the private transfer of weapons without federal approval, will be the one thing the Democrats will sacrifice everything else to get. And when the silly and stupid fringe issues are discarded, the Democrats will crow over how willing they were to compromise and be bipartisan and work with Republicans. And Republicans and gun rights groups will crow over how they got the best deal they could, how they defeated this or that onerous provision of the final bill, and why you should cut them big checks. It will be enough to make you throw up.

Jump to:
  Previous Topic    Next Topic