You are not logged in. Log In |  Register New Search
  Previous Topic    Next Topic  
advanced

Posted:  7/30/2013 4:58 PM #38604
CTD Blogger


Joined: 7/14/2009
Posts: 10057
Last Post: 4/24/2014
Subject: Federal Judge says “no” to immediate concealed carry for Illinoisans (VIDEO)
Guns.com by S.H. Blannelberry- A federal judged threw out a lawsuit on Friday filed by Illinois gun rights advocates who wanted to start carrying concealed firearms in public now, as opposed to nine-plus months from now, the expected timetable for Illinois state police to set up a permit issuance system under the state’s new ‘shall-issue’ CCW law.  U.S. District Judge William Stiehl shot down the suit filed by Mary Shepard, the main plaintiff in the initial lawsuit that overturned the statewide ban on CCW, and the Illinois State Rifle Association.
 
Shepard and representatives from the ISRA filed a motion for an injunction several weeks ago in the U.S. District Court claiming that lawmakers procrastinated and waited until the last minute to pass legislation legalizing concealed carry in the Land of LIncoln.
 
“The state’s proposed denial of Second Amendment rights for another 270 days is an unacceptable perpetuation of the state’s … infringement of Ms. Shepard’s and Illinois State Rifle Association members’ Second Amendment rights,” they said the court filing.
 
Shepard and the ISRA argued that there would be “no threat to public safety” if those possessing valid FOID cards, Firearms Owner Identification cards, were allowed to carry concealed because they have already passed a criminal background check, as CBS Chicago reported.
 
“Furthermore, plaintiffs are not asking for an unfettered right to carry firearms in public; rather, they are requesting an injunction that would allow them to carry firearms in a manner consistent with the limits imposed by … the Firearms Concealed Carry Act,” they went on to argue.
 
However, Stiehl did not believe that the wait time — 180 days to set up the system, plus 90 days to process applications — was unreasonable, arguing that it may not even take that long for the state police to get things up and running.
 
“The fact that this time period for establishing the permitting process is specified in the statute does not mean that it actually will take that amount of time for the state police to complete the process,” Stiehl wrote.
 
Read the rest here


Jump to:
 
  Previous Topic    Next Topic  

CheaperThanDirtForums